<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eyes glazed over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://managingleadership.com/blog/index.php/2007/06/01/eyes-glazed-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/06/01/eyes-glazed-over/</link>
	<description>The strategic role of the senior executive</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stroup</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/06/01/eyes-glazed-over/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/06/01/eyes-glazed-over/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Steve, thanks for your kind words and your observations about how you have seen this in your own work - the Challenger disaster is also a great example. 

It seems odd, doesn't it, that people should find this balance, or this ability to maintain mutually informing contact with both concentration and context, so hard to achieve? But you're right, it comes up often.

The antidote to indecisive and endless information gathering need not be refusal consider evidence as to how one's focus is playing out in the real world.

Thanks for stopping in, and for your always valuable thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, thanks for your kind words and your observations about how you have seen this in your own work - the Challenger disaster is also a great example. </p>
<p>It seems odd, doesn&#8217;t it, that people should find this balance, or this ability to maintain mutually informing contact with both concentration and context, so hard to achieve? But you&#8217;re right, it comes up often.</p>
<p>The antidote to indecisive and endless information gathering need not be refusal consider evidence as to how one&#8217;s focus is playing out in the real world.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping in, and for your always valuable thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Roesler</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/06/01/eyes-glazed-over/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Roesler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/06/01/eyes-glazed-over/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>This, Jim, should be submitted as a magazine article as well as a post.

I would guess that about 50% of my consulting engagements touch on this at some point along the way. It's fascinating--especially in Western culture--how over-emphasis on achieving a single goal can lead to ignoring new information and danger signs. In business, once a manager presents and commits to a goal, it can be seen as disloyal to come forward with any data that would imply the goal is no longer achievable or even desirable.

The space shuttle Challenger is one such example. While there were multiple elements to the cause of the  disaster, plenty of danger signs were fed to the launch team up until lift-off. Singleness of purpose without context and perspective turned out to be fatal.

Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This, Jim, should be submitted as a magazine article as well as a post.</p>
<p>I would guess that about 50% of my consulting engagements touch on this at some point along the way. It&#8217;s fascinating&#8211;especially in Western culture&#8211;how over-emphasis on achieving a single goal can lead to ignoring new information and danger signs. In business, once a manager presents and commits to a goal, it can be seen as disloyal to come forward with any data that would imply the goal is no longer achievable or even desirable.</p>
<p>The space shuttle Challenger is one such example. While there were multiple elements to the cause of the  disaster, plenty of danger signs were fed to the launch team up until lift-off. Singleness of purpose without context and perspective turned out to be fatal.</p>
<p>Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
