Skip to content

Punishing initiative in the name of policy

A short while ago, at the local branch of the generally first-rate gym we use, a really very minor problem was escalating into a really major one as a result of our inability to locate a staff member who cared about it. I was beginning to get all the cardiovascular exercise I needed from my frustration, alone, when something happened to change everything.

An employee assigned to the reception desk who had no responsibility for this issue whatever nevertheless, quite simply, took charge. He interjected himself into the middle of the intensifying situation, and instantly calmed it by telling my wife and I that we could go back to our workout and he would make sure our concern was resolved.

By the time we got back to the exercise area the repair had begun under his personal supervision, and in just moments the issue was resolved perfectly. Not only did we enjoy our workout, but this young man’s initiative and professionalism had caused us to forget our earlier irritation and to recover our sense of satisfaction with our contract at that facility.

On the way out, I noticed that the manager was in and I mentioned the young man’s actions to him. He became agitated on understanding that there had been some unresponsiveness by some of his staff, but at that point I was more interested in seeing the one employee recognized for his performance than the others for their lack of it.

A week later, the manager called me and asked if I was willing to write a letter of commendation for the employee who had helped us, and I did with pleasure. When I delivered it, he confided to me that he was trying to help the young man out of a difficulty. He had evidently taken the initiative in another case which involved his committing a minor infraction of a policy established by a vice president.

In the VP‘s eyes, the young man’s entire character and value as an employee were reflected in that one infraction – rather than in the larger good the infraction had served, or in the other accomplishments of this employee. The manager had asked for my letter as part of a campaign to prevent the fellow from being terminated.

This particular VP is threatening to deprive himself of a staff member who, at virtually no cost to the firm (even the repair had been done by the otherwise unoccupied staff handyman) and the exercise of but a modicum of initiative, had restored the confidence of a customer that would otherwise have been lost to them (and may, yet).

Instead, the indifferent and unmotivated automatons that were the source of the entire affair will stay at their posts, unmolested by the VP and untroubled by any concerns for the firm or its customers.

So, here are my questions for you:

  • How often, if at all, have you observed a situation like this, whether as a customer or a manager?
  • Have you ever seen all the good someone has done evaporate on the occurrence of a technical, and largely irrelevant, infraction?
  • What are your thoughts about the consequences and collateral damage, if you will, of the sort of professional initiative this young man displayed?
  • Can managers ever find a workable way to reconcile vital procedural policy and equally vital operational initiative?

Today’s tip: Adrian Savage, who writes for Slow Leadership, has published a clever piece at lifehack.org about the effects of the relentless use of militaristic language in the workplace; stop over and give it a hearing.

Have you noticed the blue “Sphere” icon, below? When you click on it, it will produce a window offering you content related to today’s item from other blogs and the regular media. Give it a try! (And, while you’re clicking around down there, don’t forget to subscribe, by email or RSS reader!)

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sphere: Related Content

RSS feed | Trackback URI

5 Comments »

Comment by Steve Roesler
2007-10-23 18:06:16

Hi,Jim,

This is one of those occurrences that is just too frequent. At least the guy has a champion who is trying to help his cause, along with a willing supporter in you.

I smiled (sort of) as I read the article. A great part of my own reasons for striking out on my own years ago was just this sort of thing. I had just received the highest performance bonus ever awarded in our department. In the same conversation, my boss said that I wasn’t really a “good fit” for the company because I moved to quickly. Then he asked if I would leave and be willing to play the same role as a consultant for twice the money and less than half the time commitment.

I guess that was a happy ending for me. But it speaks volumes about what the acceptable standards were internally.

 
Comment by Jim Stroup
2007-10-23 21:58:39

Hi Steve,

What a tough boss! I hope you’ve been able to hold up alright under that withering advice! Undoubtedly, you have been able to do much more good over a much wider audience.

It is interesting about what it suggests about the internal dynamics of the company you were in at the time, and about the attitude of both the other employees and their managers. I’m sure that’s offered insights that you have used to great benefit in your consulting work.

Thanks for your visit and comments – it’s great to have you back!

 
Comment by Cam Beck
2007-10-25 18:25:28

What a great story. The VP was so focused on the means of delivery that he failed to notice something wasn’t getting delivered and the value of someone who would do whatever it took to deliver on the promise of the organization.

What is his problem? Lack of imagination? Need for control? Need for credit?

In your case, with leadership like that, it’s easy to see why the situation escalated to the point that you started to get frustrated. Nobody wanted to own the problem or the solution. They wanted to pass the responsibility to someone else.

When my son (or someone I am managing, but mostly my son) demonstrates initiative in good faith to a poor result, I first praise him for the initiative and then explain how it could have been handled better.

 
Comment by Jim Stroup
2007-10-26 01:27:37

Hello Cam,

Thanks for your visit and your generous comments. I suspect that all three of your suggests are behind this VP’s problem, but in particular case, with an emphasis on the first two.

The time you invest in praising and guiding probably seems too proletarian for many of executives who feel their duty is done when they spout high-minded rhetoric about innovation and their most highly-valued asset. And so, when push comes to shove, it’s exposed as only that, and those same executives often cower behind policy to disguise their own lack of insight and courage.

Thanks so much for your thoughtful response, and for your good work!

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post

Bad Behavior has blocked 722 access attempts in the last 7 days.