Skip to content

Collaboration jams

Meetings. They are, of course, an essential tool for managers and workers to consider options, plan programs, coordinate activity, and assess progress.

But there are at least three problems with meetings. These are related to decision-making, accountability, and control.

Let’s take a brief look at the first one, today.

Meetings are often unconsciously used as yet another, but extremely costly, vehicle for delaying decision-making in the futile and usually unnecessary quest for perfect information. Meetings filling this need are frequently called for no real, apparent purpose, but just from a manager’s general sense of unease about not having all the facts or perspectives that might be available.

Moreover, the wastefulness of such events usually isn’t restricted to their specific occurrence. When one like this is called, it tends to generate a cascading series of pre-meetings that flood the entire unit or organization. Conference rooms are overbooked as people schedule meetings the purpose of which is to prepare for other meetings, which may, themselves, be designed to prepare for still others.

And preceding all of this is an agenda item that finds its way onto almost every individual’s calendar: “prep for mtg.” Computers hum away as people search their files, scour the internet, and email each other about the upcoming meeting. They may even conduct their own real or virtual informal meetings to help each other prepare for their individual participation in the formal ones, or even to try to figure out what they are really about.

Of course, what often isn’t humming is the organization’s actual work, as its managers allow themselves to be sidetracked overlong onto secondary lines of what are essentially maintenance activity, drawing their juniors and their staff with them. These are all the more pointless as that maintenance activity becomes increasingly irrelevant in the absence of focused execution of primary operations.

The question of when to redirect the energies of your staff from preparing to doing is a classic dilemma, and meetings have long been misused to exacerbate it. This, however, has taken on a peculiar salience in the face of modern technology, offering its elusive promise of complete information and perfect coordination.

Several months ago Jared Sandberg did his WSJ Cubicle Culture column on the sometimes drastic measures people take to avoid such pointless meeting proliferation. His target is the ease with which corporate intranet scheduling technologies encourage this problem, but it’s well worth a read in the general context of today’s and tomorrow’s topics.

The use of meetings to inform the decision-making process can be helpful, even especially effective. But its potential for misuse must be addressed forthrightly and with discipline. Otherwise, it will breed organizational anxiety and cynicism, draining the focused energy needed for execution of the eventual decision.

Let’s meet back tomorrow about this - put it on your calendar. See you then!

Be sure not to miss any of the posts in this series!

  1. Collaboration jams
  2. The swaying sword of Damocles
  3. Smoke-filled rooms
  4. Meetings - what are they all about?
  5. How about we get together sometime?
  6. Can we fit this in somewhere?
  7. Making your meeting
  8. Managing your meeting
  9. Are you sure we were at the same meeting?

Today’s tip: Visit Charles H. Green’s Trust Matters site for a piece about Faking Customer Centricity. You can’t kid your customers for long, any more than you can your staff.

Have you used the newest feature on the site yet? If you double-click on any (non-hypertext-linked) word on the main page, a window provided by Answers.com will open providing definitions or encyclopedic material about that term, together with links to additional sources of information. Try it out - it’s interesting and fun.

And, of course, while you’re clicking around, don’t forget to click on your choice of an email or RSS-feed subscription to these pages - we’ll be proud to have you join us!

Similar Posts:

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sphere: Related Content

4 Comments

  1. Jamie Notter wrote:

    Well said. My favorite book on the topic is Lencioni’s Death by Meeting (which also happens to have possibly the best title in the business book world). He doesn’t talk about the avoiding decisions dynamic that you mention, but he does talk about having a clearer “contextual structure” of your meetings, so you know better what the point is of convening people.

    Thursday, November 15, 2007 at 4:02 pm | Permalink
  2. Joe Raasch wrote:

    Hi Jim,

    If I had a nickel for every wasted hour in a meeting. I recall one instance in grad school: we had to meet as a small group on a case study. Late night after class, 9:15pm, and one of the guys says, “Ok, when does it work for everyone to meet and discuss how we’re going to approach this?”. I about died. What? We’re meeting to discuss when we’re having our next meeting?? Needless to say, that didn’t happen.

    One tactic I employed with great success on needless meetings:

    If anyone requests you to be in a meeting and doesn’t give you an agenda, decline the meeting. (this is a CLM if they are a much higher hierarchical position than you though). I found people either no longer having me sit in their meetings adding no value, or I received an agenda!

    Of course, you have to keep your side of the deal and always post an agenda, and follow up with meeting notes and action items.

    Thanks Jim for giving light to something that costs companies billions of dollars each year under the guise of productivity!

    Thursday, November 15, 2007 at 4:11 pm | Permalink
  3. Jim Stroup wrote:

    Hello Jamie,

    “Contextual structure” - perhaps that means knowing the point of your meeting, and how it fits in to the process of getting something done. That’s a decent nutshell phrase for that.

    Thanks for your visit, and for adding to the topic a reference Lencioni’s interesting work. And thanks’ for yours, as well!

    Friday, November 16, 2007 at 12:23 am | Permalink
  4. Jim Stroup wrote:

    Hello Joe,

    A meeting to prepare for participation in another meeting is bad enough, but a meeting to schedule a meeting - that’s worth more than a nickel!

    The idea of asking for an agenda in exchange for attendance is a terrific idea. It forces meeting planners to sell the time and effort they’re expecting people to invest in the meeting. What a great idea!

    Thanks for your visit, Joe, your insight, and your writing!

    Friday, November 16, 2007 at 12:29 am | Permalink

8 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. How to choose which meetings to attend | Managing Leadership on Tuesday, November 20, 2007 at 9:07 am

    [...] But how do you decide which those will be? Here’s a devastatingly simple screening tool offered by Joe Raasch in a comment to last Thursday’s post: “One tactic I employed with great success on needless meetings: If anyone requests you to be in a meeting and doesn’t give you an agenda, decline the meeting.” [...]

  2. [...] Collaboration jams [...]

  3. [...] Collaboration jams [...]

  4. The value in markeing your meetings | Managing Leadership on Monday, January 7, 2008 at 11:32 pm

    [...] Collaboration jams [...]

  5. [...] Collaboration jams [...]

  6. Importance of careful meeting design | Managing Leadership on Monday, January 7, 2008 at 11:46 pm

    [...] Collaboration jams [...]

  7. [...] Collaboration jams [...]

  8. [...] Collaboration jams [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*