Skip to content

Smoke-filled rooms

A WSJ editorial cartoon some time ago showed a pack of laughing hyenas sounding off. But one of them was unable to join in, confiding to another: “I don’t get it.”

Have you ever felt that way? Have you ever gotten the impression that you were supposed to comprehend what was happening, but something just wasn’t fitting in?

You understand the language, the procedures, even the faddishly sensitive approach to the issues. But there seems to be an undercurrent moving powerfully right beneath the surface, and driven by more primal instincts than the conversation there professes, which is giving the actual motive force to the shaping of events.

In fact, it may seem as though that surface conversation is mere window dressing, distracting us from what is really happening. Or, perhaps, it is simply providing an acceptable text for the formal record, and leaving the communication of the way things are really going to be done to the less politically palatable subtext.

Smoke screens. Many meetings are filled with them. They waft around the room, shaping what is seen at the same time that they shield motives and intent. Sometimes, they are secretly being managed by more than one cabal, attempting a corporate coup.

The thing about this phenomenon is that it is found especially - but not exclusively - in the boardroom and the penthouse meeting rooms of senior managers. It can and all-too-routinely does occur at every level. It doesn’t only happen when senior managers or directors want to put something over on their competing peers (or shareholders); it can also happen when a lower-level interest or power group wants to manipulate a development and represent it in a way that advances their cause. In this latter context, I’ve even seen a more-or-less throw-away comment by a chief executive seized upon by aggressively opinionated underlings and used eventually to virtually transform an entire organization.

A coup like this - whether in the palace or in the bureaucracy - can be perpetrated by a variety of means, but the principal and best way to snooker everyone into innocent and unaware complicity is the meeting. At the same time, the careful use of this venue in this way makes it unmistakably clear, to those knowingly involved in and aware of the power struggle, who won.

So, as we have seen in the past several days, meetings can, and commonly are, actually used to frustrate effective decision-making and accountability, and to to cloud the clear flow of control and power. What, then, are they good for?

We’ll take a look at that, tomorrow. We look forward to seeing you then.

Be sure not to miss any of the posts in this series!

  1. Collaboration jams
  2. The swaying sword of Damocles
  3. Smoke-filled rooms
  4. Meetings - what are they all about?
  5. How about we get together sometime?
  6. Can we fit this in somewhere?
  7. Making your meeting
  8. Managing your meeting
  9. Are you sure we were at the same meeting?

Today’s tips: The thing about lessons is that they are only of value if you learn from them; simply being present for them - or even the subject of them - is not enough. With that in mind, please take a moment to give a careful viewing to this excellent post by Joe Raasch, author of The Happy Burro.

Next, it is worth considering the implications of our yielding control to the sort of people who prohibit shopping center Santas from saying “ho, ho, ho,” or who place digital distortion balloons over cigarettes in movies. If that sort of thing concerns you at all, please take a moment to read this short, striking essay by Michael Wade, who authors Execupundit.com. He uses the term “haters” to describe what many of us recognize as ideologues - but he may have hit closer to the truth.

More and more readers are viewing the new mobile-friendly version of the Managing Leadership Blog on their internet-capable phones and pocket computers, and you can, too! Just use the “Get Mobile Version” link at the upper right of this page to have the address sent to your device or, for those of you reading this in your email client or RSS reader, go to http://fdm8.com/managingleadership to view the site (you can visit it right here from your computer to get an idea of what it will look like on your portable device). Try it now!

And, don’t forget to subscribe, so you’ll always get the latest posts!

Similar Posts:

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sphere: Related Content

2 Comments

  1. Joe Raasch wrote:

    Hi Jim,

    Meetings appear to be used as part of a control plan v. a change management plan.

    It takes a practiced eye to discern the difference between meetings that hide the purpose/agenda v. ones that exist to propel a strategic decision to fruition.

    I am looking forward to tomorrow’s post!

    PS -thanks for the visibility/link!

    Tuesday, November 20, 2007 at 12:08 am | Permalink
  2. Jim Stroup wrote:

    Hello Joe,

    Yes, like many things, the way meetings are often distorted tends, in time, to turn otherwise earnest people who genuinely want to contribute into skeptics with not only a sharp - but a jaundiced - eye.

    Thanks, as always, for your visit and your work!

    Wednesday, November 21, 2007 at 12:06 am | Permalink

5 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. How to choose which meetings to attend | Managing Leadership on Monday, January 7, 2008 at 11:20 pm

    [...] Smoke-filled rooms [...]

  2. [...] Smoke-filled rooms [...]

  3. [...] Smoke-filled rooms [...]

  4. [...] Smoke-filled rooms [...]

  5. [...] Smoke-filled rooms [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*