<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abhorrent vacuums</title>
	<atom:link href="http://managingleadership.com/blog/index.php/2008/01/16/abhorrent-vacuums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/01/16/abhorrent-vacuums/</link>
	<description>The strategic role of the senior executive</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stroup</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/01/16/abhorrent-vacuums/comment-page-1/#comment-2848</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/01/16/abhorrent-vacuums/#comment-2848</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,

I agree that the key here is ownership, and that ultimately it must find meaningful expression deep inside the organization, by both managers and employees. Building "ownership on the job" is key here, metaphorically, or with respect to specific procedures, decisions, initiatives, and the like.

I think the way this is interesting in the context of corporate governance is ownership by shareholders as it is expressed within the organization - if it is at all. Making that happen effectively also likely will cause "ownership on the job", as you characterize it, by managers and employees all the more trenchant and productive.

Thanks, as always, for your visit - and for adding this important dimension to the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>I agree that the key here is ownership, and that ultimately it must find meaningful expression deep inside the organization, by both managers and employees. Building &#8220;ownership on the job&#8221; is key here, metaphorically, or with respect to specific procedures, decisions, initiatives, and the like.</p>
<p>I think the way this is interesting in the context of corporate governance is ownership by shareholders as it is expressed within the organization - if it is at all. Making that happen effectively also likely will cause &#8220;ownership on the job&#8221;, as you characterize it, by managers and employees all the more trenchant and productive.</p>
<p>Thanks, as always, for your visit - and for adding this important dimension to the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why the corporate veil is giving way to litigation and prosecution &#124; Managing Leadership</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/01/16/abhorrent-vacuums/comment-page-1/#comment-2847</link>
		<dc:creator>Why the corporate veil is giving way to litigation and prosecution &#124; Managing Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/01/16/abhorrent-vacuums/#comment-2847</guid>
		<description>[...] As we mentioned yesterday, the corporate veil describes a legal principle of protecting owners from liability for the actions of the owned corporation. This has the effect of freeing up additional sources of capital and increasing its liquidity for investment. It is somewhat less well known that the veil also was intended to protect directors - and even officers - as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As we mentioned yesterday, the corporate veil describes a legal principle of protecting owners from liability for the actions of the owned corporation. This has the effect of freeing up additional sources of capital and increasing its liquidity for investment. It is somewhat less well known that the veil also was intended to protect directors - and even officers - as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Roesler</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/01/16/abhorrent-vacuums/comment-page-1/#comment-2846</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Roesler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/01/16/abhorrent-vacuums/#comment-2846</guid>
		<description>Hello, Jim,

I was thinking that "expression of ownership" extends to daily management practice. 

"Expression of ownership" in economic and political arenas would probably be affirmed by most managers as vital to the capitalistic system. The challenge arises when they need to allow "expression of ownership" by employees in decision- making, new ideas, and different points of view. Those who do see the link are those who know the importance of  building ownership on the job.

Good series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Jim,</p>
<p>I was thinking that &#8220;expression of ownership&#8221; extends to daily management practice. </p>
<p>&#8220;Expression of ownership&#8221; in economic and political arenas would probably be affirmed by most managers as vital to the capitalistic system. The challenge arises when they need to allow &#8220;expression of ownership&#8221; by employees in decision- making, new ideas, and different points of view. Those who do see the link are those who know the importance of  building ownership on the job.</p>
<p>Good series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
