Skip to content

Self development

This issue of management development - and of who is primarily responsible for it - has come up in a wide range of forms in associated work recently. One example of this is a recent Infoline on the topic for the American Society for Training and Development (ASTD); this was written for organizations.

But the question of individual responsibility in this regard has also been prominent recently, so I thought I would use this venue to offer a few suggestions about the topic over the next few days. They can be adapted and applied by managers at all levels, all of whom have self-development obligations and opportunities.

Many people think that management development is something that happens to them. But successful managers don’t just go in one end of a training pipeline and come out the other as a manager. There are two key things to bear in mind, here:

  1. You are responsible for your development as a manager and for your career. Not your boss, not the HR department, not the most “cutting edge” MBA program or consultant-designed education program. You.
  2. To develop, you must practice management. Management development isn’t a passive process wherein you attend a class, read a book, or sit through a workshop, then collect your attendance certificate and go back to work to claim your promotion. You get ideas, glean insights from others’ experience, and develop some useful conceptual frameworks at such events. But you develop as a manger by managing.

Learn from every source available to you: listen, read, even take classes. But then decide for yourself what makes sense, test it in your own management work, learn from your real-life experience with it, and build on that experience to improve.

As you gather information such as this, bear in mind the following three forms that it can take:

  1. Research. Academic institutions and large consultancies spend a lot of time and effort trying to understand all aspects of work - especially, of management. They then present these in formal courses of education, workshops, or other presentations. While there is a lot of chaff out there, there is also a lot of wheat. Learning how to distinguish between the two is as important as benefiting from the good research.
  2. Others’ experience. Many formal study programs are based on surveys of managers’ careers and perceptions. Others may be presented or facilitated by managers or those who advise them. Again, the judgment of such people is far from infallible, but you will gain much from seeing how they perceive and evaluate their experiences.
  3. Working models. Many conceptual frameworks have been developed to describe management methods. These are useful intellectual tools to help you organize information and evidence into a context that makes sense of what you see happening around you. Be careful, though, to avoid becoming overly enamored of any particular tool - use them to help you understand and manage your work; don’t allow them to manage you.

With that in mind, then, over the next two days we will take a quick look at five of the main avenues available to you to help generate ideas, experience, and - most important of all - personal insight on the basis of which you will be able to improve your management skills. Please join us!

Today’s tip: Jared Sandberg’s always intriguing Cubicle Culture column in the WSJ this week is about the frustrations of meetings. And if this is something that particularly attracts your interest, you may also want to review the popular series here on Mastering Meetings.

If you have enjoyed this post, please do join us by using the subscription links just below or at the top right of this page. And thanks - we look forward to your being aboard!

Similar Posts:

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sphere: Related Content

4 Comments

  1. Joe Raasch wrote:

    Hi Jim,

    Great topic - and a strong directive on who owns development: the manager! This is true for any position and at any level of any type of organization.

    I’ll point to a model that may help: 70-20-10.
    70% experience (practice managing!)
    20% relational (other’s experience)
    10% formal (workshops, educational degrees, seminars, books)

    And the 70-20-10 needs to be connected to work. Start with a formal course, learn about other’s experiences, and then DO IT: get that 70% experience.

    Best, Joe

    Tuesday, March 11, 2008 at 5:56 pm | Permalink
  2. Jim Stroup wrote:

    Hi Joe,

    I love this 10/20/70 model - Wally Bock talks about this experiential emphasis, also - he calls it the apprentice model. And I’m fully in agreement with both of you on that.

    Perhaps we will see that tomorrow’s post can be seen as being about the 10% and Thursday’s as about the other 20/70% - with the best coming last!

    Thanks as always for your visit, your kind words, and your excellent contributions!

    Tuesday, March 11, 2008 at 10:15 pm | Permalink
  3. Jim, I think a lot of people get hung up on “what’s the best Book?” or “What’s the best Class?” There is no cookie cutter answer. The key as you suggest is to act. Put some of the learnings into practice and see what happens. Make adjustments as necessary.

    Another mistake people make is to stop all efforts to learn, because they already know all they need to know. More often than not they make the same mistakes over and over again and don’t even realize it. They are experienced and quite good at doing things the wrong way.

    Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 4:07 am | Permalink
  4. Jim Stroup wrote:

    Hello Nick,

    Yes, I agree that there is a problem with trying to find the best external source of information and then relying solely on that. It is a symptom of the tendency to want to find substitutes for our judgment as managers, rather than trying to develop that judgment. It is made worse by the fact that there are so many diverse and conflicting opinions about the books and programs available.

    But the key to both of your points is the learning part, which happens when we evaluate information, whether it is gained through passive or active means. But the learning seems to activate a whole lot better when it happens through doing, doesn’t it? The next two bits of this piece touch on that.

    Thanks for your visit and your cogent comments!

    Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 11:49 am | Permalink

One Trackback/Pingback

  1. [...] can be helpful for you in all three of the areas discussed yesterday. Just bear in mind that however accessible, or even inexpensive due to company-provided tuition [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*