Skip to content

The jugglers

The intellectual – especially in Europe – is a modern-day pretender to the throne. Or, at least, to the elevated role of the noble – particularly after the Enlightenment – as the secular interpreter, guide, and even director of the affairs of the benighted masses.

But as we have come to know, the royals were not exceptionally intelligent. Many of them did become genuinely enlightened, though, according to one or another disturbingly self-referential form of the concept. And when you inform enlightenment with a sense of mission, but not with a remarkably astute intelligence, what do you get?  An ideologue.

And that’s a major problem with the idea of the intellectual, today – especially in the United States, where we’re likely to see more assertive use of the term in coming months and years. In the absence of the social, economic, and educational structures that maintained the distinctions between the European noble and peasant – and, later, the “gentle” – classes, the actual use or meaning of the term has become virtually impossible to pin down.

After all, in an era of widespread literacy and education – including higher education – what, really, is the purpose of the intellectual? In time, unable to satisfactorily address this question, the role morphs into that of the “enlightened one” – which is the phrase literally used to refer to intellectuals in some languages.

But in a world of increasingly popular sovereignty, despite repeatedly discredited self-assigned status as “opinion-shapers,” this role, too, grows daily more marginalized. So what’s left?

The ideologue. And yet, in a political landscape of ever-more universal suffrage, people grow accustomed to making their own decisions, and less inclined to submit to the disparaging incriminations of the scold.

Sometimes, from a spirit of tolerance and generosity that is rarely reciprocated, we accord them venues to express their views, and, sadly even if often inadvertently, offer them encouragement in their delusion that we are but humble pilgrims in respectful homage to their grandeur.

On other occasions we genuinely heed them – not for their ability to shape, but rather to articulate, our own thoughts and opinions. So, while they have their uses after all, it is they who discharge them at our bidding and under our direction, not the reverse.

But, of course, they resist, and struggle mightily to reclaim for their exclusive use the freedoms that now embrace us as well as them, and to escape the obligations which now constrain them as well as us. So, they attempt to amaze and befuddle us by juggling their various hats.

They pretend to greater intelligence or learning. When that proves insufficient to the task, they insist that they are of inherently more refined sensibility. Realizing that disciples are failing to form up according to script, they harangue and intimidate. Challenged regarding their right to adopt this pose, they return to the first one, again claiming superior knowledge or discernment.

Round and round they go; where they’ll stop – well, they never stop.

Entertaining, perhaps. But hardly edifying.

Today’s tips: You may enjoy stopping over to see this WSJ editorial cartoon depicting two gurus commiserating about the difficulties presented by their field.

Wally Bock, of Three Star Leadership, has opened a new blog dedicated to providing advice on producing effective business communication. Please stop over to see what he has to say about what comes before the first draft, and about how he learned that lesson.

Note: This site has evidently been experiencing some connection issues, recently. These are being looked into, and among other things, will be the subject of a bit of maintenance activity over the next few days – if you notice anything unexpected on these pages during that period, please do excuse and bear with us!

If you have enjoyed this post, please do join us by using the subscription links just below or at the top right of this page. And thanks – we look forward to your being aboard!

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sphere: Related Content

RSS feed | Trackback URI

3 Comments »

Comment by Peter Gluck
2009-03-18 10:13:39

Dear Friend,
I am constant reader of your papers and I will take this opportunity to thank you for
the excellent job you are doing
at Managing Leadeship. I have
learned a lot from them.
And they are interesting, well
written.
However today’s “The Jugglers”
is a surprise and NOT a pleasant one. Regarding it I have 2 questions:
- what do you want to tell?
-why are you telling it?

I think that we all need intellectuals, really enlightened
ones because the world is dominated by the destructive
triadof Greed, Violence and
Stupidity- the results are known.
There is no place for intellectuals in Mediocristan
but actually we live in Extremistan and Reason, Realism,
Pragmatism can save us.
It is an other, painful problem,
the treason of the intellectuals,
the postmodernist idea that all modesof thinking- rational or
irrational have the same right
to exist- that’s an intellectual
crime.
Please read this too:

http://www.uwgb.edu/DutchS/PSEUDOSC/WhyAntiInt.htm

Egalitarinism, populism lead to
disasters.
I think you owe some explanations
to your readers.
Best wishes,
Peter

 
Comment by Jim Stroup
2009-03-18 18:35:24

Hello Peter,

Thank you for your visit and your kind comments about the blog, generally.

I must say that I don’t accept the premise underlying your comments about intellectuals, particularly in today’s world, but I do take your points that I haven’t made it clear what I wanted to say and why I was saying it.

As it happens, the same source that prompted yesterday’s post has suggested another, which I will probably publish today. I will try to make the answers to these questions more clear, and hope to hear what you have to say about it.

Thanks again!

 
Comment by Peter Gluck
2009-03-18 19:45:39

Dear Jim,
Thank you, I am waiting for your further ideas re intellectuals.
By the way, I am an old chemical engineer not exactly what is called a genuine intellectual.
I see this problem in the
context of some greater issues as for example the wisdom of crowds vs.opinion of experts.
It is my great pleasure to discuss with you these important problems.
All my best wishes,
Peter

PS It is not easy to write in this window, sorry, so excuse me please for the typos.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post

Bad Behavior has blocked 723 access attempts in the last 7 days.